Choctaw vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Samoans
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,377,966 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Samoans.
Choctaw vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $86,498, a difference of 23.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $101,580, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $65,427, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $51,389, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $44,206, a difference of 9.8%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Fair 26.0% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.1%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.6%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.7%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Fair 12.1% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Average 5.4% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 81.8% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Fair 32.6% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.8%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Choctaw vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.4%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.2%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.5%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Samoan |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |