Immigrants from Latin America vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,986,234 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 2.9 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $65,427, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $101,580, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $100,344, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $37,498, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $54,610, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($41,049 compared to $44,206, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (23.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.42 compared to 3.42, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and family households (67.2% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.5%), college, under 1 year (56.3% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, 1 year or more (50.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.83%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.48%).