Ugandan vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,443,166 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 129.4 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $58,008, a difference of 4.9%), wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $53,185, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,541 compared to $108,161, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $105,430, a difference of 1.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $62,522, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.1%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.44%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.98%).