Fijian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,085,773 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.639. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 17.9 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $58,008, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $46,531, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $99,232, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,185, a difference of 6.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $62,522, a difference of 10.1%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.5%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 87.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 72.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.9%).