Japanese vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,537,618 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $46,531, a difference of 16.7%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $58,008, a difference of 12.7%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $108,161, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($83,395 compared to $90,026, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.2%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.74%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.8%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.5%).