Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Northern Africa
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,724,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Immigrants from Northern Africa.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $58,008, a difference of 25.4%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $108,161, a difference of 24.0%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $46,531, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $62,522, a difference of 15.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Exceptional $46,531 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Exceptional $108,161 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Exceptional $90,026 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Exceptional $49,648 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Exceptional $58,008 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Exceptional $42,084 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Exceptional $53,185 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Exceptional $99,232 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Exceptional $105,430 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Excellent $62,522 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Good 25.2% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.2%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Good 12.1% |
| Families | Tragic 12.0% | Good 8.8% |
| Males | Tragic 14.0% | Average 11.1% |
| Females | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Excellent 16.4% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 15.8% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Good 16.0% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Average 5.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Average 11.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 12.5% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.5%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Excellent 10.2% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.5% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Excellent 7.4% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Poor 35.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Poor 74.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.7%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Fair 46.0% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Average 3.22 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Fair 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.8%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Tragic 87.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Tragic 52.3% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 63.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Poor 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Poor 97.4% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Poor 97.2% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 96.9% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Fair 95.8% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Fair 95.5% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Fair 94.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Average 93.7% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Average 92.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Good 91.4% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Good 89.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Good 86.3% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 67.2% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Exceptional 61.9% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 41.9% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 17.1% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Exceptional 46.7% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Average 17.3% |
| Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |