Jordanian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,432,023 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 143.0 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $105,430, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $62,522, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($49,632 compared to $49,648, a difference of 0.030%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $99,232, a difference of 0.050%), and median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $58,008, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.0%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.4%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.62%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%).