Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,652,849 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.658. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 24.5 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $46,531, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $58,008, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($92,231 compared to $108,161, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.17%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and median household income ($79,737 compared to $90,026, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 24.0%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.2%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).