Russian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,293,212 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $46,531, a difference of 14.2%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $108,161, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $99,232, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $53,185, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $42,084, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $49,648, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.89%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.3%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%).