Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,955,444 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $103,954, a difference of 23.4%), median household income ($77,631 compared to $93,933, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $106,952, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.8%), per capita income ($40,152 compared to $42,694, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $41,656, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.0%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.3%), currently married (42.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 68.7%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 56.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.4%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.31%), college, 1 year or more (57.3% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 42.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.44%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.8%).