Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,497,396 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 69.2 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $42,694, a difference of 34.4%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $54,958, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $57,074, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $64,795, a difference of 7.8%), and median household income ($104,090 compared to $93,933, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 21.8%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.4%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (48.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.45, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 101.3%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 99.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 66.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 110.1%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 95.3%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 82.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 10.2%).