Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,474,357 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,372 compared to $103,954, a difference of 15.0%), median household income ($83,289 compared to $93,933, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $57,074, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,950 compared to $42,694, a difference of 0.60%), median male earnings ($53,457 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.8%), and wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.6%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%), currently married (43.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 72.5%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 48.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.9%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 33.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.68%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).