Immigrants from Western Asia vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,701,993 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.521. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.4%), per capita income ($46,876 compared to $42,694, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $57,074, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $41,656, a difference of 0.68%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $106,952, a difference of 0.69%), and median family income ($108,691 compared to $106,544, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 21.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family poverty (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.0%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 20.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%).