White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,057,637 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 27.3%), median household income ($82,029 compared to $93,933, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $103,954, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,180 compared to $42,694, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $54,958, a difference of 1.9%), and median family income ($99,800 compared to $106,544, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 38.7%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (48.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (65.1% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 115.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%), college, 1 year or more (57.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 81.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 6.8%).