Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,399,345 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.390. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to a decrease of 13.4 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $103,954, a difference of 20.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $57,074, a difference of 16.1%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $93,933, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.4%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $42,694, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $41,656, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 21.4%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.45, a difference of 4.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (43.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 59.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 39.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 39.6%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 35.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), male disability (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%).