Immigrants from Haiti vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,041,874 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Haiti communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Haiti within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Haiti corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,391 compared to $103,954, a difference of 30.9%), median household income ($72,599 compared to $93,933, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,257 compared to $106,952, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,398 compared to $57,074, a difference of 13.3%), median female earnings ($36,203 compared to $41,656, a difference of 15.1%), and per capita income ($36,849 compared to $42,694, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 50.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.8%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 33.2%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.39 compared to 3.45, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (65.3% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 114.1%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 96.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 33.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 71.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.2%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and college, under 1 year (56.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (89.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 6th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 10th grade (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 36.4%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.22%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.79%).