Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,028,661 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 71.9 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $103,954, a difference of 13.6%), median household income ($83,304 compared to $93,933, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $64,795, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.9%), per capita income ($40,434 compared to $42,694, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $54,958, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.45, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.9%), college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and college, 1 year or more (55.4% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.4%).