Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,765,381 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.617% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 616.7 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $103,954, a difference of 14.0%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $93,933, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $64,795, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,997 compared to $42,694, a difference of 3.0%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $54,958, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $48,305, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (45.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 78.0%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 52.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 50.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 34.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%).