Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,747,139 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.158% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia corresponds to an increase of 158.2 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,187 compared to $57,074, a difference of 23.6%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,450 compared to $103,954, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,704 compared to $48,305, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,249 compared to $106,952, a difference of 1.6%), and median family income ($108,544 compared to $106,544, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 43.2%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.17%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.8%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and family households (60.7% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (44.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 71.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 89.4%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 71.7%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 36.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).