Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,694,841 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.245% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 244.7 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $103,954, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($83,327 compared to $93,933, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $57,074, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,289 compared to $42,694, a difference of 0.96%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($45,598 compared to $48,305, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.6%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 12.3%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 39.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.0%).