Immigrants from South Africa vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,235,239 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.201% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 200.7 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,465 compared to $35,688, a difference of 44.2%), median family income ($116,286 compared to $85,647, a difference of 35.8%), and median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $46,419, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $50,279, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $34,421, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 66.3%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 63.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.62%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 5.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.66%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 89.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 85.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 73.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%).