Fijian vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,926,613 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.392% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 392.1 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $52,832, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $35,688, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,193 compared to $40,288, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,279, a difference of 0.29%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $73,823, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 34.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.64%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.4%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (51.3% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.2%).