Immigrants from Malaysia vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,889,782 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.778% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to a decrease of 2,777.5 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $35,688, a difference of 40.1%), median family income ($115,880 compared to $85,647, a difference of 35.3%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $46,419, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $50,279, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $52,832, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 52.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.8%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 38.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.9%), family households (64.0% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.41, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 49.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 95.0%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 80.2%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and female disability (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.4%).