Norwegian vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,014,126 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $86,595, a difference of 19.7%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $88,717, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $81,531, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $35,864, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $48,603, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $41,822, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 66.0%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 63.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 13.9%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.9%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.9%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 29.2%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (63.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.5%).