Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,694,957 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 15.6 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $37,695, a difference of 23.4%), median household income ($90,026 compared to $73,509, a difference of 22.5%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $88,717, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.010%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $48,603, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $54,029, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 28.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.65%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.7%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 41.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.8%).