Comanche vs Blackfeet Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Blackfeet
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Blackfeet
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,951
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
279th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Blackfeet Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,630,925 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Blackfeet.
Comanche vs Blackfeet Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $48,603, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $54,029, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $37,695, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,556 compared to $88,717, a difference of 0.18%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $73,509, a difference of 0.32%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $48,402, a difference of 0.41%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Tragic $37,695 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Tragic $88,717 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Tragic $73,509 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Tragic $41,822 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Tragic $48,402 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Tragic $35,864 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $48,603 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Tragic $81,531 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Tragic $86,595 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Tragic $54,029 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Good 25.2% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and female poverty (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 20.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 20.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 15.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.3% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 80.0% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.21%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Tragic 43.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 44.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 37.9% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 90.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Excellent 56.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.4%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Excellent 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Poor 92.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 88.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Tragic 54.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Tragic 40.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 31.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Comanche vs Blackfeet Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Blackfeet |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 26.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Tragic 48.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |