Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,242,146 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 10.4 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,054 compared to $73,509, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $86,595, a difference of 15.6%), and per capita income ($43,464 compared to $37,695, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $48,603, a difference of 8.3%), and median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $35,864, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 13.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.9%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.2%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.7%).