Immigrants from Latin America vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,944,438 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.726. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $48,603, a difference of 5.7%), and median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $48,402, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $86,595, a difference of 0.72%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $81,531, a difference of 0.78%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $54,029, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.42%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.0%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households (67.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.8% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.90%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.82%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and college, under 1 year (56.3% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.0%).