Fijian vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,412,189 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.2%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $48,402, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $54,029, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $73,509, a difference of 0.95%), median family income ($87,387 compared to $88,717, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $86,595, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 17.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.3%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.7%).