Swiss vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,913,049 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 65.6 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 20.4%), per capita income ($44,076 compared to $39,403, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $50,488, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $37,497, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($85,681 compared to $84,729, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $53,078, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.98%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.49%), family households (65.2% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.4%).