Latvian vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Bhutanese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Latvians
Bhutanese
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,672,016 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,468,872 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 6.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 72.3% | 38.6% |
| Range | 71.3% | 37.9% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 11.3% |
| Median | 12.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Bhutanese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.76%), Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (13.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |