Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,586,159 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 8.2 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $48,195, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $107,627, a difference of 11.0%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $115,162, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $55,521, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $66,694, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.13%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.76%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.8%).