Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,780,994 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $81,351, a difference of 46.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $83,311, a difference of 46.9%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $85,411, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $50,301, a difference of 15.8%), median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $37,825, a difference of 22.9%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 91.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 68.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.8%), single mother poverty (25.8% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 71.1%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 56.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 58.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 10.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 39.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 110.4%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 83.6%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.2%).