Indian (Asian) vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,538,538 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $29,031, a difference of 85.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $66,529, a difference of 79.6%), and median household income ($105,262 compared to $59,159, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 18.3%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $42,380, a difference of 37.4%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $33,046, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 145.8%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 143.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 134.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 52.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 54.6%), and single mother poverty (25.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 56.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 114.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 111.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 105.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 103.8%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 73.2%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.65, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 127.0%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 116.9%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 115.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 74.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 71.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.4%).