Indian (Asian) vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,636,284 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 16.2 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $39,403, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $90,722, a difference of 31.7%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $50,488, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $64,920, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,078, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.5%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (48.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 74.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 38.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 99.0%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 89.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 76.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 39.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and male disability (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%).