Immigrants from Liberia vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,276,223 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 50.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $65,329, a difference of 36.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $101,936, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $39,159, a difference of 3.1%), median earnings ($42,923 compared to $48,304, a difference of 12.5%), and per capita income ($38,165 compared to $45,195, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 51.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 81.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 71.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.87%), and family households (62.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 75.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.8%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.0%).