Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,309,609 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 39.2%), per capita income ($38,165 compared to $51,361, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $108,149, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $43,317, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $55,028, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $66,087, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 63.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 65.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 62.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.4%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 25.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.0%).