Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,813,941 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 10.0 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,739 compared to $119,094, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $109,741, a difference of 35.7%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $99,943, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $54,512, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $44,161, a difference of 16.3%), and median earnings ($42,923 compared to $53,268, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 58.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 44.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 54.4%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 38.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 87.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.7%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 40.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.7%).