Immigrants from Liberia vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,408,699 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 55.9 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $51,844, a difference of 8.1%), and median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $40,299, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,896 compared to $75,647, a difference of 1.0%), median family income ($90,450 compared to $88,987, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,739 compared to $85,571, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 35.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (22.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 42.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.6%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.96%), family households (62.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 143.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 24.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 11.1%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.26%), associate's degree (42.3% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.80%), female disability (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.3%).