Immigrants from Liberia vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,805,347 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 46.6 Spanish American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $55,573, a difference of 15.8%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $33,625, a difference of 12.9%), and per capita income ($38,165 compared to $34,195, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,739 compared to $87,561, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $53,077, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $76,670, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.0%), married-couple households (40.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and family households (62.0% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (41.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 101.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 57.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 69.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%).