Fijian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,431,369 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.969. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.943% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 943.1 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $98,778, a difference of 16.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $64,920, a difference of 14.4%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $84,729, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,078, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $37,497, a difference of 6.8%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $39,403, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 14.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.76%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.41, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.28%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.0%).