British vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

British
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

British

Hawaiians

Good
Fair
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in British Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,535,749 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.618. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 111.3 Hawaiians.
British Integration in Hawaiian Communities

British vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,571 compared to $39,403, a difference of 18.2%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.2%), and median male earnings ($57,890 compared to $50,488, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $64,920, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $53,078, a difference of 3.1%), and median household income ($88,914 compared to $84,729, a difference of 4.9%).
British vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricBritishHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,571
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,705
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,914
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,189
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,890
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,772
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,477
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,359
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,264
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,940
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Excellent
24.9%

British vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.13%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
British vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricBritishHawaiian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.4%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.9%

British vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.4%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
British vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBritishHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.5%

British vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.75%).
British vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBritishHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.5%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
81.5%

British vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.41, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
British vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBritishHawaiian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Poor
33.2%

British vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.53%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.9%).
British vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBritishHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.0%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.9%

British vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 46.2%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
British vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricBritishHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.8%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.3%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

British vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
British vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricBritishHawaiian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%