Norwegian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,341,988 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 21.5 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.4%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $39,403, a difference of 12.9%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $50,488, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $53,078, a difference of 0.090%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $84,729, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $37,497, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 44.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.4%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.41, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.61%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.71%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%).