Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Hawaiians

Good
Fair
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,315,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 96.2 Hawaiians.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $39,403, a difference of 19.9%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $50,488, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($48,617 compared to $43,673, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,635 compared to $84,729, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $98,778, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $64,920, a difference of 6.3%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
24.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.6%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.29%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.6%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
81.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.94%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Poor
33.2%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 61.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.7%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
8.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.6%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.81%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 18.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynHawaiian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%