Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Hawaiians

Excellent
Fair
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,429,635 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 20.2 Hawaiians.
Lithuanian Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $39,403, a difference of 25.5%), median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $50,488, a difference of 21.3%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $43,673, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $64,920, a difference of 0.45%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $53,078, a difference of 0.89%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $84,729, a difference of 10.8%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricLithuanianHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Excellent
24.9%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 33.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.19%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianHawaiian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
9.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.9%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianHawaiian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.5%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.5%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.0%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianHawaiian
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Poor
33.2%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
8.9%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.81%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Lithuanian vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianHawaiian
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%