Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Chickasaw
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 37.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 15.5% | 21.2% |
| Range | 14.6% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.6% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Serbian (3.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
| German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |