Icelander vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,621,710 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.3%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $43,010, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $53,201, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($85,797 compared to $85,818, a difference of 0.020%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $39,328, a difference of 0.56%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $46,478, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.2%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.68%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.2%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.4%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%).