Crow vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 632,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $43,010, a difference of 35.6%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $85,818, a difference of 34.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $99,943, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,328, a difference of 11.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,201, a difference of 13.2%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,478, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 91.0%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 83.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 221.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 214.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 212.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.1%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and nursery school (99.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.68%).