Choctaw vs Hungarian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Hungarians

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hungarian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,746,582 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 18.7 Hungarians.
Choctaw Integration in Hungarian Communities

Choctaw vs Hungarian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $103,913, a difference of 26.3%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $45,426, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $97,544, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $50,247, a difference of 10.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $61,673, a difference of 16.2%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Income
Income MetricChoctawHungarian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Excellent
$45,426
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Excellent
$105,609
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Good
$86,920
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Excellent
$47,795
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$57,309
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Average
$39,510
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$50,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Excellent
$97,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Excellent
$103,913
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Good
$61,673
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
29.0%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 32.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.8%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.2%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawHungarian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Excellent
11.0%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawHungarian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawHungarian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
39.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Fair
82.7%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.0%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawHungarian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Good
31.2%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.0%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawHungarian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
6.4%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.6%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.0%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawHungarian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Good
38.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Good
15.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Choctaw vs Hungarian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%).
Choctaw vs Hungarian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawHungarian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.5%