Cherokee vs Hungarian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cherokee

Hungarians

Fair
Good
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hungarian Integration in Cherokee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,711,596 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Hungarians.
Cherokee Integration in Hungarian Communities

Cherokee vs Hungarian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $45,426, a difference of 22.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $97,544, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $103,913, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $50,247, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $39,510, a difference of 13.7%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Income
Income MetricCherokeeHungarian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,203
Excellent
$45,426
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,209
Excellent
$105,609
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,682
Good
$86,920
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,252
Excellent
$47,795
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,669
Exceptional
$57,309
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,742
Average
$39,510
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,848
Tragic
$50,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$80,843
Excellent
$97,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,125
Excellent
$103,913
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,133
Good
$61,673
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
29.0%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.9%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Poverty
Poverty MetricCherokeeHungarian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.7%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.2%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.7%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.2%
Excellent
11.0%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCherokeeHungarian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCherokeeHungarian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.9%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.2%
Exceptional
39.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.1%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
82.7%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.22%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCherokeeHungarian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.7%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Good
31.2%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 16.0%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCherokeeHungarian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.9%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
6.4%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Education Level
Education Level MetricCherokeeHungarian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.2%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.9%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Good
38.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Cherokee vs Hungarian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Cherokee vs Hungarian Disability
Disability MetricCherokeeHungarian
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%